Brief Summary National Parks pesticide use.

Brief Summary, timeline so far.

I have recently discovered that our national parks are using significantly more pesticides than I had assumed and I am deeply concerned about this impact on our native creatures. The use of pesticides in our national parks could have impacts on endangered animals across the board; frogs, newts, their eggs and young, bats (have you thought about bat mother's milk?), and many, many others -- sticklebacks, birds? Many biocides have an impact on animals far more than just the adults.

In my opinion it is _critical_ that this important data is made much more available to researchers and concerned citizens who are knowledgeable about specific pesticide properties, endangered species, or habitat challenges. I am not convinced that the wonderful, hard-working people in the Parks Service can always be fully up on current research on the latest greatest neurotoxin or DNA regulatory system poison, and the impact these poisons will have on our endangered wildlife. Getting specific chemical names, the amounts used, and locations is vital for any intelligent analysis of pesticide use.

I initially assumed that pesticide use was a fairly reasonable amount - a couple of pounds here and there. I mean, after all they are protecting our natural lands right?.
But the longer time has gone on and the vigorous resistance I have received to acquiring any information at _all_, the more concerned I have become. Our National Parks should not be Monsanto's, DuPont's, and Dow chemical's testing grounds or personal playpens.

This is a summary as of November 20th. Much more detailed information than you would probably like is at..... www.puravidaaquatic.com/wordpress/summary-our-national-toxic-parks-project-as-of-november-15th/ And even worse; mind numbingly more details at.... www.puravidaaquatic.com/wordpress/our-national-toxic-parks/

_____________________________________________ Current attempts at contacting Park officials and getting pesticide data....

Phone, Email, or web links contacted. Not in chronological order.

Main Freedom Of Information Act site, www.foia.gov/ , Thursday Oct 19th 2023 freedom of information act FOIA filed, No response yet

Everglades, Hillary Cooley 305-242-7875 Hillary_cooley@nps.gov , October 18th,sent voice message., No response
November 20th sent email., Often voice message calls can be dropped...
November 21st, responded, sorry not going to give it to you _contact FOIA.
November 22nd,sent,sorry you misunderstood. I want _your_ public documents _And budget.

Hillary had cc'd public relations gal. November 22nd, sent email and I asked her for her background.

Sequoia National Park, general information 559-565-3341,October 18th,sent voice message., no response yet.
November 20th, https://www.nps.gov/seki/contacts.htm, sent, form , no response yet.

NPS Commercial Services Environmental Audits,
cs_envaudits@nps.gov,November 6th 2023,sent,, Not responsible for this information. Actually they mistold the truth. They are directly associated with integrated Pest Management.

Yosemite National Park,
yose_superintendent@nps.gov, Thursday Oct 19th 2023,contact form on Yosemite's website sent. Responded 10/31 with link that doesn't work and junk.
sent asking for the integrated Pest Management officer or office contact link no response yet.
Thursday November 14th,sent the link you supplied does not work., November 14th replied no PUPS link and complete change of original email., junk
November 20th, sent, reiterated request for PUPS access and their public documents., no response yet.

Take home point so far: junk and no responses.

State of California Pesticide Usage Reporting (PUR),
PUR.lnquiry@cdpr.ca.gov, Monday November 6th 2023,sent, CDPRWeb@cdpr.ca.gov, Monday November 6th 2023,sent, November 13th, received, very nice response_ but National Parks are not required to, and do not give them any data.

Regional IPM Coordinator Pacific West Region Brent Johnson, e-mail us... www.nps.gov/orgs/1103/ipm.htm ,Wednesday November 8th,sent,
November 17th reply, nope_ not going to give you any information. contact FOIA.
November 20th, reply, no thank _you_ Brent I want all public documents that you have filed with local counties and I want your budget.

Sierra club main office,
communications@dc.sierraclub.org,sent, any interest in publishing an annual report?, No response yet.

World wildlife fund (WWF), November 19th,https://help.worldwildlife.org/hc/en-us/requests/new, partial response November 20th.

Audubon society, November 19th,media@audubon.org no response yet.

The Nature Conservancy, November 20th,editor@tnc.org no response yet

Continued Googling starts turning up reports of problems in the Parks
https://peer.org/park-service-lack-of-transparency-created-its-huge-foia-backlog/
.
Close to 1,500 National Park Service FOIA request backlog. Certainly seems that they're just ignoring many of them.

And how about ....
http://www.schundler.net/TheDarkSide.htm

Things like this maybe why there are all those FOIA backlogs. (1500 😮)That and the fact that it is specifically written into the FOIA law that there are _no_ penalties for ignoring them. 😆. So I emailed the guy above and he sent me a very nice response back. Which is why this is included in the summary. Hmmm budgets if anyone wants to get curious.

_____________________________________________
Googling world wide Web for "Integrated Pest Management" "National parks (NPS IPM)",mid-october, NPS integrated Pest Management IPM required by federal law., YES! Hmmmmmmm Why didn't Yosemite superintendent mention this? And why when I asked specifically for it did she ignore it.

_____________________________________________
Attempt to search the National Park service PUPS database link that the Superintendent of Yosemite sent me in response to my question about pesticide use in Yosemite National park. irma.nps.gov/Portal, Link gives Error message....small link at the bottom to irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Search/Quick,This error message link is _not_ PUPS. It is to a large database on Park publications, some going back to 1914. Searched this database for "PUPS pesticide" in all national parks 4 integrated Pest Management articles oops :-) but they don't really say anything other than that they're using pesticides according to Monsanto and Dow chemical and Dupont's PR departments. Now think about four results in a database that contains tens of thousands of records and includes dates from 1914; where the Integrated Pest Management offices are _supposed" to be doing monthly reports to counties, and annual reports federally. And there are only four (accidental?) entries. Oh my.

Searched for "Pesticide applied" in _all_ national parks., 34 results, Most were meaningless for our purposes. There were some published "effectiveness of ...." reports that were obviously funded by pesticide manufacturing companies. But there were two "pesticide use log(s)" one for Pea Ridge National Military Park. 1991. Pesticide Use Log. Pea Ridge, AR and the other Pea Ridge National Military Park. 1994. Pesticide Use Logs. Pea Ridge, AR.... WOW but I had trouble getting anything other than a summary. In both cases looking under "Permissions" led to the description "Permission to Download Files": "NPS Staff" other links are "public" . The reports are supposed to be public, and are on a public database, but the permission to download any usable files are restricted to NPS staff. How awesome for our public records in our National Parks.
The following searches were done on the IRMA database for Yosemite specifically. "pesticide", "pesticide application", "application pesticide", "glyphosate", "Roundup", "Round_up", "Round-up", "Rodeo, "Biocide, "IPM coordinator", "Integrated Pest Management", "integrated pest Managements", "Federal Pesticide Management", "insecticides" Nothing on _applying_ pesticides

Take home point: Most governmental agencies have not bothered to contact me back. Yosemite the only Park to contact me back has simply given me the runaround. Links that don't work, information that is not valid, and then a complete change in what they told me at first. The massive IRMA Park database which has tens of thousands of publications and supposedly includes all "science" being done in the parks includes only four references to the PUPS database, none of which have any data that the public can download. Neither does it have a single word about pesticide _application_ in most of our national parks, again they seem to be only worried about blaming pesticide drift from outside the park. Not what they've been applying since almost certainly the '50s. And lastly when Yosemite Park specifically is searched on IRMA there is no public record of _any_ publication dealing with pesticide application, the Integrated Pest Management office, or Federal Pesticide Management.

You decide whether this is unusual or not. I have decided that this is going to be the start of a permaculture sustainability project to obtain access to the National Park Service (NPS) Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Database. If you would like to be a part of this project please contact us.

www.puravidaaquatic.com/ www.puravidaaquatics.com/ 310-429-8477

Spread the Good News Below: Permaculture!
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Summary Our National Toxic Parks project as of November 15th

Summary, timeline so far.


I have recently discovered that our national parks are using significantly more pesticides than I had assumed and I am deeply concerned about the impact on our native creatures. This could have impacts on endangered animals across the board; frogs, newts, their eggs and young, bats (have you thought about bat mother's milk?), and many, many others -- birds? Many biocides have an impact on animals far more than just the adults.

In my opinion it is _critical_ that this important data is made much more available to researchers and concerned citizens who are knowledgeable about specific endangered species or habitat. I am not convinced that the wonderful, hard-working people in the Parks Service can always be fully up on current research on the latest greatest neurotoxin or DNA regulatory system poison, and the impact these poisons will have on our endangered wildlife. Getting specific chemical names, the amounts used, and locations is vital for any intelligent analysis of pesticide use.


I initially assumed that pesticide use was a fairly reasonable amount - a couple of pounds here and there. I mean, after all they are protecting our natural lands right?.

But the longer time has gone on and the more resistance I have received to acquiring any information at _all_, the more concerned I have become. Our National Parks should not be Monsanto's, DuPont's, and Dow chemical's testing grounds or personal playpens.


This is a summary as of November 15th.
More detailed information than you would probably like is at.... https://www.puravidaaquatic.com/wordpress/our-national-toxic-parks/


_____________________________________________
Current attempts at contacting Park officials and getting pesticide data....

Phone, Email, or web links contacted. Not in chronological order.

https://www.foia.gov/,Thursday Oct 19th 2023 freedom of information act FOIA filed asking for pesticide use information in three of the national parks Yosemite, Sequoia, and Everglades., No response yet but the FOIA site says that it can take up to a year.

Everglades 305 242-7700,October 17th,sent voice message, interested in pesticide usage in the park.
October 17?19th,reply,speak to Hillary Cooley 305-242-7875.
Hillary Cooley 305-242-7875,October 19th,sent voice message,I would like some information on pesticide use in the park. No response yet

Sequoia National Parks information 559-565-3341,October 17th,sent voice message, phone number before and after.... interested in pesticide use, no response yet

cs_envaudits@nps.gov,November 6th 2023,sent, National integrated Pest Management requesting information on pesticide applications in the parks....products used, amounts, locations, etc., No response yet

yose_superintendent@nps.gov,
Thursday Oct 19th 2023 filled out the contact form on Yosemite's website and sent it requesting information on pesticide applications in the park: products used, amounts, locations, etc., Responded 10/,31
yose_superintendent@nps.gov,10.31.2023,Received, email with link that doesn't work and junk.
yose_superintendent@nps.gov,Tuesday November 9th,sent,asking for the integrated Pest Management officer or office contact link.
yose_superintendent@nps.gov,Thursday November 14th,sent, link you supplied does not work. If you could please supply me a link that is publicly accessible (PUPS) database. And before you send it please check that it is publicly accessible

PUR.lnquiry@cdpr.ca.gov, Monday November 6th 2023,sent,PUR Pesticide Use Reporting (California) --unfortunately only by County data.... asking if they have any information on national parks.... maybe add California parks to their database., No response yet

CDPRWeb@cdpr.ca.gov, Monday November 6th 2023,sent,
PUR asking if they have any information on national parks.... maybe add California parks to their database., Responded November 13th.
CDPRWeb@cdpr.ca.gov, Monday November 13th, received, very nice response but National Parks are not required to and do not give them any data.
CDPRWeb@cdpr.ca.gov, Tuesday November 14th,sent, Thank you! It is nice to have anyone respond

contact@savethefrogs.com,Tuesday November 7th,sent, are you aware....
contact@savethefrogs.com,Wednesday November 8th,received,could you give us more information.
contact@savethefrogs.com,Wednesday November 9th,sent, potential issues with tadpoles.
contact@savethefrogs.com,Thursday November 9th,received, Kerry from save the frogs great response back but no unpublished the data about pesticide use
contact@savethefrogs.com,November 10th,sent, Thank you!

https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1103/ipm.htm
And then down near the bottom: "Find a Regional IPM Coordinator" ...
And then: Pacific West Region (Unified regions 8, 9, 10, 12)
Brent Johnson, e-mail us....
https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1103/ipm.htm
,Wednesday November 8th,sent,standard questions; for three national parks over 5 yrs. - what, where, and how much., No response yet.


communications@dc.sierraclub.org
I am interested in understanding if the Sierra club has any intent in publishing an annual report on the pesticide usage in our National Parks?....I'm sure you're aware that more and more people are becoming concerned about the amount of pesticides used everywhere.... and I am puzzled why large environmental groups such as yours have never, and are not now, including in their publications an annual report., No response yet

_____________________________________________

Googling world wide Web for
Integrated Pest Management, National parks?
NPS IPM, mid-october, NPS integrated Pest Management IPM.... federal law., YES! Hmmmmmmm Why didn't Yosemite superintendent mention this?


_____________________________________________

Search the National Park service database that the superintendent of Yosemite sent me in response to my question about pesticide use in the park.
https://irma.nps.gov/Portal
Link gives Error message....small link at the bottom to
https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Search/Quick

This is not PUPS but....Searched for:

"PUPS pesticide" in all national parks
4 integrated Pest Management articles oops :-) but they don't really say anything other than that they're using pesticides according to Monsanto and Dow chemical and Duponts PR departments

"Pesticide applied" in _all_ national parks., Most were meaningless for our purposes. There were some published reports that were obviously funded by pesticide manufacturing companies. But there were two pesticide use log(s) one for Pea Ridge National Military Park. 1991. Pesticide Use Log. Pea Ridge, AR and the other Pea Ridge National Military Park. 1994. Pesticide Use Logs. Pea Ridge, AR.... In both cases under "Permissions" "Permission to Download Files": " NPS Staff" the reports are supposed to be public and are on a public database but the permission to download any usable files is restricted to NPS staff. How awesome in our National Parks

The following searches were done for Yosemite specifically

"pesticide" ,only turns up a few links to outside projects analyzing chemical residue coming from sampling in the park.

"pesticide application",no results found.
For "application pesticide",no results found.
None?? Seriously 😃 and the IRMA searches supposedly include all of 'Park Science'

"glyphosate" ,no results found

"Roundup" ,1 result.
The Director’s Report; A Message from Director Roger Kennedy: From Here to Where We Want to Be Regional Roundup
.... Regional _Roundup_ 😆....So no pesticide results found.

"Round_up", no results found

"Round-up", no results found

"Rodeo: no results found

"Biocide: no results found

"IPM coordinator",no results found

"Integrated Pest Management", one result see next line.
"integrated pest Managements",Both gave one result. One!.. from 1914 😆....

Yosemite National Park - Superintendent Annual Report (1914)....
Several pages down....
Quote:
"INSECT CONTROL.
The work of felling and burning insect infected trees with the object of eradicating injurious
insects and protecting the remaining trees from other attacks has been continued this season under the direction of Mr. J. J. Sullivan, entomologist, of the Department of Agriculture.
Work has been done in the vicinities of Big Meadows, Little Yosemite, and the valley of
the Illilouette"
End Quote,

interesting if they had continued non-toxic methods we would probably all be better off.


Federal Pesticide Management",1result....Unpublished Report

Sierra Nevada-Southern Cascades (SNSC) Region Air Contaminants Research and Monitoring Report
Staci L Simonich, Leora Nanus....,

Obviously this report is _again_ not about pesticide application in the park.

"insecticides",one...
This link is only about pesticide drift from outside the Park....Summertime transport of current-use pesticides from California's central valley to the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range, USA, again they seem to be only worried about blaming outside the park. Not what they've been doing since the '50s

"herbicide",No results found

"application data",10 or so, None relevant except I enjoyed one which was bragging about an "application" for a cell phone tracking app. So they would have better data for Park sales points. 😆. One way of looking at it is that they would rather track you than keep you or our native animals safe.🥴🤔
_____________________________________________


Take home point: The massive IRMA Park database which has tens of thousands of publications and supposedly includes all science being done in the parks does not include any reference to Yosemite's PUPS database or have a single word about pesticide _application_ in most of the parks.

This is going to be the start of a permaculture sustainability project to obtain access to the National Park Service (NPS) Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Database. If you would like to be a part of this project please contact us

vidaaquatic@gmail.com
http://www.puravidaaquatic.com/
310-429-8477

http://www.puravidaaquatic.com/
http://www.puravidaaquatics.com/
310-429-8477

Spread the Good News Below: Permaculture!
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Our National Toxic Parks


Timeline so far


Thursday Oct 19th 2023 FOIA filed asking for pesticide use information in three of the national parks; Yosemite, Sequoia, and Everglades

Start:
I would like to thank whoever is researching this as I know it is sometimes a tough job figuring out what people are asking :-). I am asking for pesticide use information in at least three of the national parks: Sequoia, Yosemite, Everglades. If there is a database for all Parks that would be awesome.
I would like to ask what are the trade names for all pesticides used in each Park for the last five years. If any of the pesticide formulations used are other than a specific trade name then I am asking for the chemical composition specifying the active ingredient and carrier compounds. I am asking for the amounts used for each pesticide item above. I am asking for the acreage and location each of the items is applied to (a map would be great). And finally I am asking for the item cost for each of the pesticide items, I do not need the application cost.
Thank you again.
Bob Lloyd
End:


Thursday Oct 19th 2023 filled out the contact form on Yosemite's website and sent it requesting information on pesticide applications in the park: similar to above; amounts, names, and areas applied.

Also contacted the other parks (Everglades and Sequoia) figuring that with the FOIA, I would start at both ends :-)


October 31st 2023 Received response from YOSE Superintendent, NPS • yose_superintendent@nps.gov


Where they told me...


Hello,

Pesticide use in the National Park Service is documented online through the Pesticide Use Proposal System (PUPS). https://irma.nps.gov/PUPS

Each formulation of pesticide is documented. For example, the active ingredient glyphosate may be found in the trade products Round-up and Rodeo; any use of each product is documented. The percentage of active ingredients are recorded as found on the label; labels are also included in the PUPS. Pesticides mix rates are dependent on the target pest. Carriers, surfactants, and any other additives follow the pesticide label, but are not recorded in PUPS or elsewhere.

Pesticide use is documented annually. This includes, the amount of pesticide applied, the amount of active ingredient applied, the acreage, and species in which the pesticide was applied.

Pesticide cost is dependent on the distributor and changes frequently. The park does not track pesticide cost. Many of the pesticides used can be found at local hardware stores, agricultural supply stores, or pesticide distributers and they would be a better resource to find current costs.

If you would like more information, you can file a Freedom of Information Act request at Freedom of Information Act (U.S. National Park Service) (nps.gov) .

Office of the Superintendent
Yosemite National Park

209-372-0286



https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/national-park-service-announces-cicely-muldoon-as-yosemite-national-park-s-new-superintendent.htm

Sounds great doesn't it?

But nowhere in her departments email did it mention the park was required to have an Integrated Pest Management office or coordinator responsible for all pesticide use and responsible for the _exact_ information I was asking for. My source says that it is federal law that all our national parks are required to have this department. Hmmmmmmm They are awfully hard to reach.

And then when one tries following the link her department sent me it doesn't work. And even the searches one can get it to do are not the PUPS database. And if one reads the rest of her departments response it sounds like a PR release from Monsanto


_____________________________________________

Later information found independently (see details below obtained November 1st) revealed that the Park _is_ responsible for having an Integrated Pest Management office or coordinator. The superintendent of this park neglecting to mention that they have a specific office or coordinator specifically responsible for all the details I was asking for seems particularly ... willful?.


In addition the link they supplied doesn't work the best. The link the YOSE Superintendent, NPS • yose_superintendent@nps.gov sent gives an error message with a second small link at the bottom. The second link goes to a IRMA site. Where there is a 'certainly very easy to find' second search link. It is certainly understandable to me why the superintendent wouldn't send a direct link to the search link. I mean if you expect me to search for something why make it easy? And as noted above this is a separate database from the PUPS


https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Search/Quick


But we decided to search anyway.
A IRMA search with the link above for "pesticide" only turns up links to outside projects analyzing chemical residue coming from some minimal sampling in the park. I cannot find any Park pesticide application information. If I search for pesticide _and_ application (either order) I get no results. None?? Seriously 😃 and the IRMA searches supposedly include


Park Science:
"Park Science reports the findings of recent and ongoing natural and social science and related cultural research and their implications for park planning, management, and policy."


_____________________________________________


But Park Science doesn't _ anything about pesticides _applied in the park? Wow that's the most amazing science I have heard in a long long time. I don't believe that chemical sampling at a few locations (locations chosen by whom?) (And what specific chemicals are tested for: chosen by whom?) is valid for my interests. I want to know what they are applying, where, and how much.


So back to their original email...


"Each formulation of pesticide is documented. For example, the active ingredient glyphosate may be found in the trade products Round-up and Rodeo; any use of each product is documented. "


No, they are not.


Search on the public IRMA portal...
For glyphosate: no results found
For Roundup: 1 result.
The Director’s Report; A Message from Director Roger Kennedy: From Here to Where We Want to Be Regional Roundup
.... Regional _Roundup_ 😆


For Round_up or Round-up: no results found
For Rodeo: no results found
For Biocide: no results found
I've already described the pesticide junk.


I want to know what they are applying, where, and how much. I just don't think that is unreasonable. And the director of the national parks just sent me non-information and willfully did not answer my question. And lastly, do you really think that if the park was being open and honest about this data that _all_ the searches above would all have given _no results found_


Nov1,2023
So googling I found something that says each Park has to have an IPM coordinator. And that all pesticide use has to be coordinated with them and that there are very specific forms to use. So there's no question in my mind that they have a database and the superintendent just simply (and certainly accidentally) neglected to send me that information.


PARK IPM PROGRAM & FEDERAL PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS
Following are requirements of the NPS IPM program and Federal Pesticide Management:
Approval for Pesticide Use
Requests for the use of any pesticides must be submitted annually using the Pest Management Program
_____________________________________________


So I googled the text above and came up with tons of links that had wonderful spokes people from the pesticide industry writing public service announcements about how all the pesticides used in our national parks are so important to keeping every single one of us safe from everything else. But I also found a PDF that had an email link for NPS IPM.
cs_envaudits@nps.gov

Sent an email November 6th 2023


https://irma.nps.gov/Portal
https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Search/Quick


Renewed searches on the public IRMA portal...
Tested adding an s to the end of some words and still got the same results. So not really worried about insecticides versus insecticide


Search on the public IRMA portal

For IPM coordinator: no results
For "pesticide" _and_ "application" either order: no results.
For Integrated Pest Management
And integrated pest Managements.
Both gave one result. One!.. from 1914 😆

NPS DataStore
Integrated Resource Management Applications
DataStore-2.10.3.23239-20230926-105412
National Park Service
U.S. Department of the Interior
Natural Resource Stewardship and Sciencearrowhead
Homedown arrow image 0
Searchdown arrow image 1
Reports
Contact Us Help
Log In
Quick Search
References are displayed based on a ranking system. References that are more recently published, have digital files, and have been accessed most frequently
are displayed first. The columns are sortable by clicking on the column name to help you navigate your search results.
Click here to learn more about search results
1
9776
1914
Published Report
Yosemite National Park - Superintendent Annual Report (1914)
National Park Service - Yosemite National Park
Page
1
of 1
Records per Page
50
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1
US Department of the Interior FOIA Privacy Policy Disclaimer and Ownership NPS Home USA.gov Accessibility Experience Your America TM
_____
Several pages down in this Yosemite National Park - Superintendent Annual Report (1914) link ....
Quote:
"INSECT CONTROL.
The work of felling and burning insect infected trees with the object of eradicating injurious
insects and protecting the remaining trees from other attacks has been continued this season
under the direction of Mr. J. J. Sullivan, entomologist, of the Department of Agriculture.
Work has been done in the vicinities of Big Meadows, Little Yosemite, and the valley of
the Illilouette" End Quote:

_____________________________________________
Good for them!
They were working and burning for insect control in 1914. Which wouldn't poison any birds -- even if they used their latest greatest burn technique. On the other hand: later superintendents have probably been spraying the latest greatest insecticides since the 1950s, but in Sequoia and _especially_ in the Everglades _all_ the contaminating chemicals come from _outside_ the parks. 🤔 Who would have thought? Haven't found any links to Yosemite yet. 🤔


Continued searching on the public IRMA portal
For Federal Pesticide Management:

1
2254288
2012
Unpublished Report
Sierra Nevada-Southern Cascades (SNSC) Region Air Contaminants Research and Monitoring Report
Staci L Simonich, Leora Nanus
Page
1
of 1
Records per Page
50
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1
______

Obviously this report is not about pesticide application.


Continued searching on the public IRMA portal

For "PUPS"

1
87781
1982
Journal Article
The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels
Warren G Holmes, Paul W Sherman

Ground squirrel babies -- pups. The entire database for Yosemite does not mention their chemical database PUPS even once.

For insecticides: One...
This link is only about pesticide drift from outside the Park...

Summertime transport of current-use pesticides from California's central valley to the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range, USA


Agricultural activity in California's Central Valley may be an important source of pesticides that are transported in the air to the Sierra Nevada mountain range, USA. Pesticides applied to this intensive crop production area may volatilize under warm temperatures typical of the valley and be transported through the atmosphere to be deposited in the cooler, higher elevation regions of the Sierra Nevada mountains. To determine the extent of summertime atmospheric transport of pesticides to this region, high volume air, dry depositing, and surface water samples were collected in the Central Valley and at different elevations in California's Sequoia National Park. Results revealed that the high...more
LeNoir JS and Others. 1999. Summertime transport of current-use pesticides from California's central valley to the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 18(12):2715–2722
https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/etc.5620181210


_____________________________________________


Searched on the public IRMA portal

For herbicide: No results found
For application data: 10 or so. None relevant except I enjoyed one which was bragging about an "application" for a cell phone tracking app. So they would have better data for Park sales points. 😆


Seriously National Park "Service" ?


_____________________________________________


This is going to be the start of a permaculture sustainability project to obtain the National Park Service (NPS) Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Database. If you would like to be a part of this project please email or call.

vidaaquatic@gmail.com
http://www.puravidaaquatic.com/

310-429-8477


http://www.puravidaaquatic.com/
http://www.puravidaaquatics.com/
310-429-8477

Spread the Good News Below: Permaculture!
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The EPA removes federal protections for most of the country’s wetlands

The EPA dialed back pollution protections for inland waterways including streams and wetlands in alignment with a Supreme Court decision. NPR’s Michel Martin talks to Ariel Wittenberg of E and E News.

Source: The EPA removes federal protections for most of the country’s wetlands

😢😦😮😢😢😢😦😮😢😢

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Community gardens have some challenges too.

Community gardens are awesome! And I don’t want to discourage anybody from getting a plot in a community garden!!!!! We need you 😃. I’ve been in half a dozen community gardens over the years and in every single one there are a few members who are a challenge. And I want to get a key word in here for search engines: They are a problem for community gardens. Typical human beings — where; in one particular case, she threw her waste tree trimmings into someone else’s plot instead of walking an unimaginable 30 ft to the compost pile. The tree trimmings were a few small branches, the point is that she seems to consider other people’s property as hers. She steals tarps, she takes over sheds, and she uses other people’s plot as if she, not they, had paid the fee.

It’s the attitude here. Oh, I should/can take it, it is just _one_ tomato. Oh, I can walk through their plot as a shortcut because I’ll be careful. Oh, it’s just one ear of corn. Oh, it’s not even a full-sized tomato it’s just a cherry tomato …. Or a strawberry, or far worse literally killing someone’s garden by shutting off their water because of a perceived drip, instead of contacting the leadership so that appropriate people can be notified. And we’ve all experienced that attitude of I’m going to follow you and talk at you until I get my way. 😃 Or better yet “please don’t do that”…. What did _I_ do?

It doesn’t matter at all how small the thing in question is because it’s the attitude and because the garden is “owned” by these people — I call them dime store gods. Because about all they have behind them is worth about a dime, but they sure want to play God. Real estate communities have police to protect the community members from people that feel that they can take whatever they want and play God in anyway they feel like. And little dime store gods lie, cheat, and steal because “the other person” _deserves_ it. Even killing! Most killings aren’t random but by somebody who believes that they are God and have the _right_ to terminate someone else’s life. The people who steal catalytic converters truly and honestly _believe_ that society owes them — and they are going to play God and take it.

Any organization running a community garden has a very deep obligation to protect the gardeners from the garden “criminals”. It is much more work to do this than sticking a sign out on the street, setting up a web page, and collecting money for the plots. It is far less enjoyable than paying a water bill and believing that that -in itself- is all that’s required to support the community. It is a huge amount of work to oversee all the humanity even for a small community garden. It is _hard_ to terminate the petty criminals. But it is the organization’s responsibility to be a mama bear.  A mama bear who protects her gardeners from dime store revenge wanabe tiny gods. A mama bear does not say “oh that wolf isn’t that big, it won’t really hurt my cub.”  A mama bear goes to bat right then and there for her cub — no matter how big the problem… period.

For all the community garden boards I salute your hard work and encourage you to be mama bears for your gardeners.

I think community gardens are a huge part of the future and fortunately only a very few are struggling to adequately police their members.
The best to you ALL. And I _never_ use all caps because it’s screaming. 😃

Spread the Good News Below: Permaculture!
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

For The First Time, Pig Kidneys Transplanted Into a Human Provide Life-Sustaining Function

An incredible success.

Source: For The First Time, Pig Kidneys Transplanted Into a Human Provide Life-Sustaining Function

Definitely not Absolutely
Terminally
Stupid.

Look up xenographs.

Xenografts

Man who received landmark pig heart transplant died of pig virus, surgeon says

Spread the Good News Below: Permaculture!
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Perfectly Preserved Dinosaur Embryo Found Inside Fossilized Egg

The 66- to 72-million-year-old specimen is one of the most complete dinosaur embryos ever found.

Source: Perfectly Preserved Dinosaur Embryo Found Inside Fossilized Egg

Sorry: just another dinosaur post :-)

Spread the Good News Below: Permaculture!
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Critics warn California bill protecting school officials would punish parents who speak out at board meetings

A new bill is advancing in the California legislature that would criminalize harassment of any school official. The bill’s vague language, critics said, will punish parents for speaking out.

Source: Critics warn California bill protecting school officials would punish parents who speak out at board meetings

Los Angeles unified School district LAUSD has a dropout rate of 50% for African-American males.

Think about that….
Now think about it again….

It is condemning all those kids to hell. No high school diploma. No jobs. No future. This is absolutely appalling. And in my opinion, it is absolutely disgusting. There is absolutely no excuse for it. Where were these freaking bureaucrats when it was getting to that level. And to allow this status quo to continue and not think outside the box to break this cycle is not acceptable. Passing a law that protects the -only think “inside the box”  bureaucrats- is _not_ acceptable. It is about time we start “harassing” these mentally crippled bureaucrats who not only let it get to this point but are defending the continuation of this obscenity.  I have no words for their behavior.

Spread the Good News Below: Permaculture!
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

EPA Approved a Fuel Ingredient Even Though It Could Cause Cancer in Virtually Every Person Exposed Over a Lifetime

An EPA document shows that a new Chevron fuel ingredient has a lifetime cancer risk more than 1 million times higher than what the agency usually finds acceptable — even greater than another Chevron fuel’s sky-high risk disclosed earlier this year.

Source: EPA Approved a Fuel Ingredient Even Though It Could Cause Cancer in Virtually Every Person Exposed Over a Lifetime

Stunning.

calculate the lifetime cancer risk from breathing air pollution that comes from a boat engine burning the fuel. That calculation, which was confirmed by the EPA, came out to 1.3 in 1, meaning every person exposed to it over the course of a full lifetime would be expected to get cancer.

Well there’s really no reason to overstate such an appallingly significant risk. It’s not _every_ person it’s only nine out of 10!
Holy frack.

Six environmental organizations concerned about the risks from the fuels — the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, Moms Clean Air Force, Toxic-Free Future, Environmental Defense Fund and Beyond Plastics — are challenging the agency’s characterization of the cancer risks.

So you might want to consider donating to one of the organizations above they’re at least trying to keep sloppiness at the EPA at bay.

Wow hang in there people.

Spread the Good News Below: Permaculture!
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mysterious Creatures Feed Microbes to Their Babies in New Scientific First

These obscure amphibians are full of surprises.

Source: Mysterious Creatures Feed Microbes to Their Babies in New Scientific First

Biology is so cool! Evolution has figured out so many ways to do things. Sustainability and permaculture are about living with the world modeling our systems on biological systems to minimize our impact. How can you possibly model our systems on biological systems unless you learn about the biology. Every single permaculturist: every single person who believes that they are living a sustainable existence should be exploring biology, taking biological classes, reading and learning about new biological discoveries. I am incredibly passionate about this and I believe that as much as I want to believe that I am one of the the world’s greatest persons –I’m not. I have too much left to learn.

Spread the Good News Below: Permaculture!
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment